Clausewitzs on war a biography of cancer
Clausewitzs on war a biography of cancer cells...
Is clausewitz still relevant
Clausewitz’s Divisions: Analysis by Twos and Threes
© Thanatonautii | Soldiers Clearing The Area Photo
Most commentaries on Clausewitz’s great study of war observe that he was not systematic in his analysis.
He adopted no comprehensive methodological approach but used a variety of analytical devices, shifting from one to another as he saw fit. On War therefore does not offer the strategist any clear instructions on how to go about doing strategy.[i] It is nonetheless worthwhile surveying the motley collection of the methods he does use, first to understand that a sophisticated analysis of war does not require sophisticated or abstruse methodology, and second to grasp that the best method is the one that brings greatest clarity to the topic at hand.
Even from a cursory reading of On War it is evident that Clausewitz frequently bases his analysis on opposites, polarities and contradictions: offence and defence, means and ends, action and reaction (